With yesterday's Apple Cup victory over the Washington State Cougars, the University of Washington Huskies improve to 8-4, their best record since 2001. This puts them firmly in 3rd place of the Pac-12 North (after Stanford and Oregon) and 6th overall. Okay, not great but for a team that went 0-12 just 5 years ago, that's not too shabby. It is, of course, worse than I had hoped at the beginning of the season. One problem is, the Pac-12 is strong this year. For instance, of the 12 teams in the Pac-12, five are ranked and we played four of them (our four losses). But, there was a time this season the Huskies were ranked #15, before hitting the meat grinder in the middle of their schedule playing Stanford, Oregon, then Arizona State (the other loss was to UCLA).
The Huskies are, however, inconsistent. Last week against Oregon State, going in as underdogs, there were brilliant. Yesterday they were dodgy the first half and came out the second half and dominated the Cougs for a 27-17 victory. So if coach Steve Sarkisian is going to work on anything, it's got to be consistency. Yes, he's done amazing things with this program (there was a time that if the Huskies were losing, and they usually were, they'd give up about half-way through the third quarter). But he need to work more and get his talented team working more consistently. And he needs to stop relying so much on Bishop Sankey.
As you can tell I'm a die-hard Huskies fan. I'd love to see this team return to the glory of the 1990s. We keep hoping "next year" looking at the talent of the younger players. Maybe Sarkisian is the problem. Maybe he can only bring the Huskies this far and to complete the journey to national dominance they need a different leader. I don't know.
One more game this season: a bowl game against whom no one knows (I saw one prediction it would be against BYU). Then we wait, again, for "next year."
Saturday, November 30, 2013
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
The End of NaNoWriMo is Just the Beginning
So it's November 27th and there are three (including today) days left in NaNoWriMo (National Novel Writing Month). You are probably getting toward the end if you aren't there already. Personally, I'm at 54,615 and I'm sticking a fork in it and calling it "done."
So, we hope, you have pounded out 50,000 words (at least) by Saturday (I know, it'll be hard tomorrow; why they put NaNoWriMo in November with a major holiday in the U.S. I have no idea). So now what?
I hate to tell you that you're maybe about half-way done with the work.
At the beginning of NaNoWriMo you signed an "Agreement and Statement of Understanding" which states, in part:
Here's what I plan to do with my NaNoWriMo writings:
But please do not think that after hammering out 50,000 words of "clunky dialogue, clichéd characters, and deeply flawed plots" you are done. That's the easy part. If you want to be a writer, you have to finish the work and do it correctly. The end of NaNoWriMo is just the beginning of your work.
So, we hope, you have pounded out 50,000 words (at least) by Saturday (I know, it'll be hard tomorrow; why they put NaNoWriMo in November with a major holiday in the U.S. I have no idea). So now what?
I hate to tell you that you're maybe about half-way done with the work.
At the beginning of NaNoWriMo you signed an "Agreement and Statement of Understanding" which states, in part:
During the month ahead I realize I will produce clunky dialogue, clichéd characters, and deeply flawed plots. I agree that all of these things will be left in my rough draft, to be corrected and/or excised at a later point.But I think a lot of NaNoWriMo participants forget the last part: "to be corrected and/or excised at a later point." They hammer out a first draft and think they are done. They aren't.
Here's what I plan to do with my NaNoWriMo writings:
- Let it sit a bit and "fester." At least a week (the longer the better).
- Re-read and proofread and edit.
- Let it sit a bit and fester some more. Another week, at least.
- Re-read, proofread, and edit. Yes, again.
- Get as many people as I can to proofread and edit it for me. They will see things I won't (if you read this blog you know what a lousy proofreader I am!).
- Have it read to me. This is a great way to hear bad writing. Make changes as you go. (Also, the person reading will also see typos that were missed before.)
- Edit it again.
- Send to betas and incorporate any suggestions they have you think is valid.
- Smile, because now it's done (three or four months later).
But please do not think that after hammering out 50,000 words of "clunky dialogue, clichéd characters, and deeply flawed plots" you are done. That's the easy part. If you want to be a writer, you have to finish the work and do it correctly. The end of NaNoWriMo is just the beginning of your work.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
High Hopes
When I was a kid my mother used to sing songs a lot as she worked around the house. I thought she made them up because they were so silly no one else would have thought of them (like Mairzy Doats). One song talked about "high hopes." And "high hopes" was what us University of Washington Husky fans had for this football season. And to be honest, at the beginning of the season, it looked that way. Opening day in the new Husky Stadium we were underdogs to Boise State and beat them soundly. We went on to a 4-0 record, the best start we'd had in years. We were ranked nationally at #15.
Then came Stanford, Oregon, and Arizona State. When we played Stanford, they were ranked #5 and I still think a bad call cost us the chance to win that game. Then we had to play the Phil Knight Ducks, who were at the time ranked #2. I didn't get to see the game but all accounts said the Huskies held their own until the fourth quarter. Then we played Arizona State who, I thought, we should be able to beat. We got killed in a blow-out. In our defense, this was the first game of ASU's surge to go on and win the Pac-12 South title and be currently ranked #12 in the AP poll.
So now we were 4-3. We beat a hapless California, destroyed Colorado (even pulling out our first stringers), and then lost to #13 UCLA. We were 6-4, barely bowl eligible.
Then came our game over Oregon State last Saturday and, as I said, where was this team all year?
So going into the annual Apple Cup cross-state rivalry game against Washington State Cougars, we are 7-4. We are in third place in the Pac-12 North (after Stanford and Oregon) and tied for 6th in the Pac-12 overall (tied with Arizona who we beat). Yes, we could have been better but with a very strong Pac-12, it would have been tough.
If we win the Apple Cup against the Cougars we will be 8-4, barely an improvement on the 7-5 we've been the past three years. If we lose the Apple Cup (and anything can happen with the Apple Cup) we'll be 7-5 again.
The good news is, in the Colorado and Oregon State games we played a lot of second stringers and they look good and are young players who will be starters in future years. Because starting quarterback Keith Price was injured in the UCLA game, back up quarterback (and probable starter next year) redshirt freshman Cyler Miles looked great against the Beavers.
So, once again, I'm am saying "Maybe next year." Seems I've been saying that for 20 years or so, now.
Then came Stanford, Oregon, and Arizona State. When we played Stanford, they were ranked #5 and I still think a bad call cost us the chance to win that game. Then we had to play the Phil Knight Ducks, who were at the time ranked #2. I didn't get to see the game but all accounts said the Huskies held their own until the fourth quarter. Then we played Arizona State who, I thought, we should be able to beat. We got killed in a blow-out. In our defense, this was the first game of ASU's surge to go on and win the Pac-12 South title and be currently ranked #12 in the AP poll.
So now we were 4-3. We beat a hapless California, destroyed Colorado (even pulling out our first stringers), and then lost to #13 UCLA. We were 6-4, barely bowl eligible.
Then came our game over Oregon State last Saturday and, as I said, where was this team all year?
So going into the annual Apple Cup cross-state rivalry game against Washington State Cougars, we are 7-4. We are in third place in the Pac-12 North (after Stanford and Oregon) and tied for 6th in the Pac-12 overall (tied with Arizona who we beat). Yes, we could have been better but with a very strong Pac-12, it would have been tough.
If we win the Apple Cup against the Cougars we will be 8-4, barely an improvement on the 7-5 we've been the past three years. If we lose the Apple Cup (and anything can happen with the Apple Cup) we'll be 7-5 again.
The good news is, in the Colorado and Oregon State games we played a lot of second stringers and they look good and are young players who will be starters in future years. Because starting quarterback Keith Price was injured in the UCLA game, back up quarterback (and probable starter next year) redshirt freshman Cyler Miles looked great against the Beavers.
So, once again, I'm am saying "Maybe next year." Seems I've been saying that for 20 years or so, now.
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Where Was This Team All Season?
I have to admit I was more than a little worried going into last night's University of Washington Huskies football game against the Oregon Beavers. Both teams had the same records: 6-4. But the Huskies had not won a game on the road against a Pac-12 opponent in recent memory. Add to that that starting quarterback Keith Price was not going to start due to an injury he sustained in last week's horrible loss to UCLA (adding injury to insult).
Apparently I needn't have worried. From the opening kickoff the Huskies dominated. Back up quarterback Cyler Miles (a redshirt freshman) performed exceptionally well (much better then when we took over at UCLA) and Bishop Sankey ran for 179 yards and three touchdowns. Toward the end of the third quarter Miles was using an arsenal of weapons: up and coming players who will help the Huskies be a better team next year.
The hapless Beavers didn't score a point until the fourth quarter when the Huskies had who-know-how-many second and third-string players on the field, including their third-string quarterback. And the Huskies still managed to score, almost without trying very hard, it seemed. The final score was 69-27.
If this team has shown up at UCLA last week, they could have won. They would have had a chance against Stanford or Oregon and maybe not have lost to a resurgent Arizona State (who last night won the Pac-12 South championship with a victory of UCLA). If this Husky team shows up next week, an Apple Cup victory against Washington State will be a assured.
The Huskies have gone 7-5 the past four years. They are now 7-4 so a win Friday against WSU would improve their record to 8-4. Not a great improvement but as good as Cyler Miles and other young players looked last night, the Huskies might be in for great things next year, even against what will probably be still, a very strong Pac-12 North.
Last night's win puts Washington in the third position in the Pac-12 North behind top-10 teams Oregon and Stanford.
(In other good news, the Phil Knight Ducks lost to Arizona yesterday, which should knock them out of BCS contention. Yes, that's pure schadenfreude but when it comes to Oregon, I'm guilty.)
Apparently I needn't have worried. From the opening kickoff the Huskies dominated. Back up quarterback Cyler Miles (a redshirt freshman) performed exceptionally well (much better then when we took over at UCLA) and Bishop Sankey ran for 179 yards and three touchdowns. Toward the end of the third quarter Miles was using an arsenal of weapons: up and coming players who will help the Huskies be a better team next year.
The hapless Beavers didn't score a point until the fourth quarter when the Huskies had who-know-how-many second and third-string players on the field, including their third-string quarterback. And the Huskies still managed to score, almost without trying very hard, it seemed. The final score was 69-27.
If this team has shown up at UCLA last week, they could have won. They would have had a chance against Stanford or Oregon and maybe not have lost to a resurgent Arizona State (who last night won the Pac-12 South championship with a victory of UCLA). If this Husky team shows up next week, an Apple Cup victory against Washington State will be a assured.
The Huskies have gone 7-5 the past four years. They are now 7-4 so a win Friday against WSU would improve their record to 8-4. Not a great improvement but as good as Cyler Miles and other young players looked last night, the Huskies might be in for great things next year, even against what will probably be still, a very strong Pac-12 North.
Last night's win puts Washington in the third position in the Pac-12 North behind top-10 teams Oregon and Stanford.
(In other good news, the Phil Knight Ducks lost to Arizona yesterday, which should knock them out of BCS contention. Yes, that's pure schadenfreude but when it comes to Oregon, I'm guilty.)
Friday, November 22, 2013
Guest Book Excerpt: Luke Murphy
Luke Murphy |
Please enjoy this excerpt from Dead Man's Hand:
Prologue
At exactly 6:15 p.m. on a Sunday, Calvin
Watters parked his rusted Ford Taurus across the street from a vacant house.
Climbing out, he put on a pair of sunglasses and scanned the neighborhood for
any movement or potential hazards.
He moved to the back of the car and opened
the dented trunk. It creaked in the still night as it slowly swung up. He
pulled out a worn black leather case and slid it under his vest. Then he closed
the trunk and headed for the door.He'd been using the rundown house in the red-light district of Las Vegas as his workshop for three years. It suited his purpose. No interruptions, no inquisitive neighbors. Even the local police avoided the area.
He checked the perimeter again. At six-five
and 220 pounds, with tattooed arms and gold chains dangling around his thick,
muscular neck, a black man like him just didn't go unnoticed in Las Vegas.
The street was silent as he approached the
house. Weeds sprang from cracks in the sidewalk and shattered liquor bottles
blocked the entrance. The barred windows were broken and the screen door had
been ripped off its hinges. His sense of smell no longer reacted to the stench
of urine and vomit.
Calvin surveyed the area one last time.
Extreme caution was one of the reasons he had succeeded in the business for so
long. His habits had kept him alive. Satisfied no one had seen him, he trudged
his way up the walk.
Even though he was the best in the business
and had once enjoyed the adrenaline rush that came with the trade, the next
part of the job made his skin crawl. His goal was to save the money he needed
to get away, start over, but he didn’t know if he could last on the job long
enough. That uncertainty made his life even harder.
He unlocked the door, stepped inside and
shut it behind him. Heading for the basement, he took a narrow set of wooden
stairs that creaked as he descended into darkness. His dreadlocks scraped
cobwebs along the rough ceiling. He flicked the switch and a low-watt bulb cast
dim light.
The tiny room had almost no furniture. The
bare concrete floor was dirty and stained with dried blood. In the middle of
the room, a lone wooden chair—double nailed to the floor—was occupied.
"Hello, James," Calvin said, his
face expressionless.
James Pierce stared at him through bulging,
fear-filled eyes.
"Sorry about the bump on the head, but
I couldn't have you conscious when I moved you here."
When Calvin removed the case from his vest,
he saw Pierce's pant leg moisten.
"I’m sure you’re wondering why your
shoes and socks are off and your pant legs rolled up. We’ll get to that."
He laid the case on a small table,
strategically placed next to the chair. "There's only one way out,"
he said, snapping open the lid. He knew his hostage saw one thing when he
looked at him—professionally trained brutality.
He checked his watch. Pierce had been there
for four hours. The waiting and anticipation alone were more than most men
could handle. They often begged for their lives. It was a very effective
method.
He stared at Pierce for a long moment and then
turned away, his stomach churning.
Get a grip, Calvin! Hurry up and get it
over with before you change your mind.
And lose the reputation he'd spent three
years building.
He ripped the duct tape from the man's
mouth and pulled out the old rag. "Time for me to collect."
Pierce gasped, breathing in air greedily.
"Please, Calvin. I beg you. Don't do this."
"You're a degenerate gambler, James.
Your expensive hobby and inability to pay has put you here. You knew the rules.
They were laid out well in advance."
"No! Please…"
Calvin tried to block out the man's cries.
A sudden dizziness overwhelmed him and he grabbed the chair to steady himself.
Finish the job. "You know how this works." He stared at Pierce.
"I promise I'll pay. Just give me one
more day. Please."
"You knew the rules. You've already
had an extra week, James. You're lucky Mr. Pitt is a forgiving man, more
forgiving than I am. He’s only counting that week as one day late. But if you
aren't in his office tomorrow morning with all the money, you'll be seeing me
again. Every late day will count as two. And I won't be so nice next
time."
"I'll pay." Pierce sobbed.
Calvin heaved a sigh. "Relax. It'll
all be over soon."
He leaned over the table. For effect, he
took his time as he opened the leather case and removed the tools of his trade.
"One day, one joint."
This was when most of them broke down all
the way. And Pierce didn't disappoint him. A scream boiled from the man's belly
and erupted like a relentless siren.
Calvin ignored Pierce as best he could.
There were 206 bones in the human skeleton. A pro had trained him to use them
all.
"Hammer or pipe cutter?"
"God, no!"
"Hammer or pipe cutter?" He threw
a punch at Pierce's jaw, sending bloody spit into the air.
"Hammer!" Pierce screamed.
"Finger or toe?"
Pierce squeezed his eyes shut.
"Toe."
Calvin stuffed the dirty rag back into the
man's mouth. He turned and pressed play on the radio resting on the table,
turning the volume up a few notches, careful not to bring attention to the
house. The pounding, vibrating beat from Metallica not only drowned out his
prey's moans of pain, but the sound took him back to his glory days. He removed
a ball-peen hammer from the pouch and moved in on his quarry’s bare feet.
"Toe it is then."
He got down on one knee and lifted the
hammer above his head.
After Pierce had passed out from the pain,
Calvin checked the man's breathing and then entered an adjoining room that
could be locked from the inside. On one side, the shelves were piled with
canned or packaged food and beverage containers. He had stored several months'
worth of supplies in case he ever came under siege and was trapped.
His complete arsenal hung on the other
side. He'd been collecting weapons for three years, purchasing them where he
could when he had saved some money. Now the arsenal was almost complete and in
his mind, quite impressive. The arsenal had been developed for defensive
purposes only.
He had never carried a gun as a collector,
but now he selected a weapon for his trip. Something small enough to conceal,
but at his ready in case he ran into a nosy cop or former client.
He checked on Pierce again as he left the
bomb shelter and moved upstairs to his computer. Once the computer booted up,
he hacked into a couple of restricted sites, trying to find any mention of his
name by a babbling client or angry competitor. Seeing nothing, he switched over
to the LVMPD site to make sure Rachel was staying clean. He checked up on her
three times a week. He wouldn't let her slip up.
He logged off and documented his latest
collection, noting the methods that worked with Pierce, as well as times and
techniques. All of the information was added to a file that spanned three
years.
Shutting down the computer, he returned to
the basement. He transported Pierce to the gambler's blood-red sedan, which
Calvin had parked by the river. He knew that within the hour James would wake
up and drive home. What would he tell his wife? There was no worry about Pierce
ever relaying this incident to anyone else. Calvin was sure of that.
As he drove back to his workshop, he let
out a soft groan. "I need out."
Dead Man's Hand
What happens when the deck is stacked against you…
From NFL rising-star prospect to wanted
fugitive, Calvin Watters is a sadistic African-American Las
Vegas debt-collector framed by a murderer who, like the Vegas Police,
finds him to be the perfect fall-guy.
…and the cards don't fall your way?
When the brutal slaying of a prominent
casino owner is followed by the murder of a well-known bookie, Detective Dale
Dayton is thrown into the middle of a highly political case and leads the
largest homicide investigation in Vegas in the last twelve years.
What if you're dealt a Dead Man's Hand?
Against his superiors and better judgment, Dayton is willing to give Calvin one last chance. To
redeem himself, Calvin must prove his innocence by finding the real killer,
while avoiding the LVMPD, as well as protect the woman he loves from a
professional assassin hired to silence them.
"You may want to give it the whole night, just to see how it turns out."
—William Martin, New York Times bestselling author of The Lincoln Letter
—William Martin, New York Times bestselling author of The Lincoln Letter
"Dead Man's Hand is a pleasure, a debut novel that doesn't read like one,
but still presents original characters and a fresh new voice."
—Thomas Perry, New York Times bestselling author of Poison Flower
but still presents original characters and a fresh new voice."
—Thomas Perry, New York Times bestselling author of Poison Flower
"Part police procedural, part crime fiction, Dead Man's Hand is a fast, gritty ride."
—Anne Frasier, USA Today bestselling author of Hush
—Anne Frasier, USA Today bestselling author of Hush
And you can find Dead Man's Hand at Amazon.com.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
NaNoWriMo Seems to Work
Yes, I was, (and still am a bit) a NaNoWriMo (National Novel Writing Month) skeptic. I said it didn't think it was a good idea to encourage people to write just for writing's sake. And yes, I still think a lot of bad fiction will come out of NaNoWriMo and a lot of it might be self-published without proper editing/re-writing.
But, having said that, I think now, since I'm participating in NaNoWriMo, it does have value. I participated in NaNoWriMo due to peer pressure. My local writing group is very much into it so I decided to go along although I was already 40,000 words into a planned 60,000 word WIP (Work in Progress). So I have been cheating a bit (I'm on my third "WIP" in November).
But, here is the thing that I think makes NaNoWriMo a fairly good idea: one of the hardest parts for a lot of would be (and established) writers is sitting down and actually writing. You have great plans but to write it is tough. So many distractions and self-doubts get in the way. NaNoWriMo gives you an excuse to say, "to heck with it, I'm writing." And it has worked for me. I have written two things I may not have ever written if it weren't for NaNoWriMo, both ideas I've had bouncing around my head for a while. When I finished those (both short stories about 5,000 words long) I was floundering around for something else to write because I was still short of 50,000 words by more than 10,000 words. So I latched onto something I wrote and posted here a long time ago and decided to continue the story (I am not counting the 509 words posted on this blog in my NaNoWriMo total). That is now at 7,787 words and no where near the end. I'll probably get to 50,000 total words in a couple of days and still have more to write on that story (I need a conflict to arise and soon).
Why am I bothering? Because I don't want to let down my local MLs (municipal liaison) who are friends. I don't want to let down my local writers' group, which is full of friends. Yes, it's the peer pressure to write and it works. (This is, they have found, why people in wars will risk their lives: they don't want to let down their unit which probably contains friends and at least contains peers.)
So, what NaNoWriMo seems to do is to get you to actually write. But, what it does that I don't like it is gets a lot of people to write badly.
However, writing badly is the first step to writing well. So that, in itself is not horrible, as long as those books don't end up on the Kindle and damaging the reputation of all writers.
So I've gone from being a complete NaNoWriMo skeptic to an adherent. Well, sort of.
But, having said that, I think now, since I'm participating in NaNoWriMo, it does have value. I participated in NaNoWriMo due to peer pressure. My local writing group is very much into it so I decided to go along although I was already 40,000 words into a planned 60,000 word WIP (Work in Progress). So I have been cheating a bit (I'm on my third "WIP" in November).
But, here is the thing that I think makes NaNoWriMo a fairly good idea: one of the hardest parts for a lot of would be (and established) writers is sitting down and actually writing. You have great plans but to write it is tough. So many distractions and self-doubts get in the way. NaNoWriMo gives you an excuse to say, "to heck with it, I'm writing." And it has worked for me. I have written two things I may not have ever written if it weren't for NaNoWriMo, both ideas I've had bouncing around my head for a while. When I finished those (both short stories about 5,000 words long) I was floundering around for something else to write because I was still short of 50,000 words by more than 10,000 words. So I latched onto something I wrote and posted here a long time ago and decided to continue the story (I am not counting the 509 words posted on this blog in my NaNoWriMo total). That is now at 7,787 words and no where near the end. I'll probably get to 50,000 total words in a couple of days and still have more to write on that story (I need a conflict to arise and soon).
Why am I bothering? Because I don't want to let down my local MLs (municipal liaison) who are friends. I don't want to let down my local writers' group, which is full of friends. Yes, it's the peer pressure to write and it works. (This is, they have found, why people in wars will risk their lives: they don't want to let down their unit which probably contains friends and at least contains peers.)
So, what NaNoWriMo seems to do is to get you to actually write. But, what it does that I don't like it is gets a lot of people to write badly.
However, writing badly is the first step to writing well. So that, in itself is not horrible, as long as those books don't end up on the Kindle and damaging the reputation of all writers.
So I've gone from being a complete NaNoWriMo skeptic to an adherent. Well, sort of.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Guest Post: Luke Murphy
Luke Murphy |
Today we have a guest post from Luke on marketing, something I think all writers and readers would be interested in. So please welcome once again, Luke Murphy:
Marketing my Debut
Novel
It can be said with
near certainty that I didn’t follow the path of the average writer. As a child,
I never dreamed of writing a best-seller, never aspired to write the next
classic novel, I wanted to be an NHL superstar…period. Unfortunately injuries
shortened my career to only four games with the Florida Panthers in 1999 and a
six-year career in the minor leagues, so I needed to find a new path.
From a family of avid
readers, even as a child, I always had a passion for books. Whether it was
reading novels on road trips or writing assignments in school, literature was
always part of my life.
In the winter of 2000,
after sustaining a season ending eye injury while playing professional hockey
in Oklahoma City, I found myself with a lot of time on my hands, and a new
hobby emerged.
I didn’t write with
the intention of being published. I wrote for the love of writing, as a hobby.
I continued to hobby write through the years, honing my craft, making time
between work and family obligations.
Then I made a decision
to take my interest one step further. I’ve never been one to take things
lightly or jump in half way. I took a full year off from writing to study the
craft.
I constantly read,
from novels in my favorite genres to books written by experts in the writing
field. My first two purchases were Stein on Writing, a book written by
successful editor Sol Stein, and Self-Editing for Fiction Writers by Renni
Browne and Dave King.
I read through these
novels and highlighted important answers to my questions. My major breakthrough
from Stein’s book was to “Show don’t Tell”. I had to trust my readers. I even
wrote that phrase on a sticky note and put it on my computer monitor.
The Self-Editing book
helped me learn how to cut the FAT off my manuscript, eliminating unnecessary
details, making it more lean and crisp, with a better flow. I learned to cut
repetition and remain consistent throughout the novel.
I continually
researched the internet, reading up on the industry and process “What is
selling?” and “Who is buying?” were my two major questions.
I attended the “Bloody
Words” writing conference in Ottawa, Canada, rubbing elbows with other writers,
editors, agents and publishers. I made friends (published and unpublished
authors), bombarding them with questions, learning what it took to become
successful.
Feeling that I was
finally prepared, in the winter of 2007, with an idea in mind and an outline on
paper, I started to write DEAD MAN`S HAND.
My marketing started
with the writing of my book. I always had a plan, an idea of the plot, but now
I had to think about the characters and setting.
I wanted characters
who readers could relate to. Characters that were real, not fictional to the
point of unbelievable. My protagonist, Calvin Watters, is as real as they come,
with faults and weaknesses like us all. Because of my sports background, I
wanted Calvin to also have an athletic background. I was a pro hockey player,
but I decided that hockey would be fine for a Canadian fan base, but I wanted
to cater worldwide, so I chose football. I believe that more people follow
football than hockey.
For the setting, I
needed a major market in the United States that people would want to read
about, so I chose Sin City, Las Vegas. Everyone is interested in this
fast-paced, party-all-night lifestyle and city that is party-central.
But in today’s
society, most people don’t realize that writing a book is more than just
putting a good story down on paper. I learned this quickly. Agents and
publishers want someone with a “platform”, someone who already has a fan base
and is guaranteed to sell books. It’s risky for a publisher to take a chance on
a new writer, because there is no telling how many books they will sell, no
matter how good that book may be.
In 1999 I graduated
from Rochester Institute of Technology with a degree in Marketing, so I felt I
had a running start at promoting my work.
It took me two years
(working around full time jobs) to complete the first draft of my novel.
The first person to
read my completed manuscript was my former high school English teacher. With
her experience and wisdom, she gave me some very helpful advice. I then hired
McCarthy Creative Services to help edit DEAD MAN’S HAND, to make it the best
possible novel.
I joined a critique
group, teaming up with published authors Nadine Doolittle and Kathy Leveille,
and exchanging manuscripts and information. Working with an editor and other
authors was very rewarding and not only made my novel better, but made me a
better writer.
When I was ready, I
researched agents who fit my criteria (successful, worked with my genres, etc.)
and sent out query letters. After six months of rejections, I pulled my
manuscript back and worked on it again. Then in my next round of proposals, I
was offered representation by the Jennifer Lyons Literary Agency.
After months of
editing with Jennifer, and more rejections from publishers, my dream was
finally realized in April, 2012, when I signed a publishing contract with
Imajin Books (Edmonton, Alberta).
Once my publishing
contract was signed, then the real work began, building my “platform”. I knew
that when I signed on with a smaller publisher that the bulk of the promotion
load would fall on my shoulders, and I accepted that.
I did four things
quickly: created my own website, started a blog, and opened a Facebook page and
Twitter account.
Now, I have been
fortunate to have had many jobs in my life, jobs that have created interest in
not only myself, but what I do.
Here are some things I
did next:
-
I scribed
a letter to all of my email contacts (2500) and all of my FB friends (2500).
-
I scribed
a letter for all of the media outlets (radio, TV, print) in the cities where I
played hockey, or have contacts. One of the benefits of playing professional
hockey was that I went through a lot of interviews with personalities in all
forms of media.
-
I picked
out the site for my launch party and spoke with the owner about it.
-
I played
hockey for teams and leagues all over North America, creating a fan base in a
variety of cities, and also worked in hockey camps, so I already had some
followers that I contacted.
-
I was a
reporter on the radio for a couple of years after retiring from hockey, and my
radio reporting was a presence on the web as well as in radio.
-
My sports column,
Overtime, which was a main feature in The Pontiac Equity, not only had a
following but helped in writing concise and exciting prose.
-
I composed
a list of local stores for potential book signings
-
I compiled
a list of local stores to sell my book
Next I picked out my target audience and
searched the web for them:
-
Thriller readers looking for an
atypical thriller hero—an African-American who is no saint.
-
Sports fans will be fascinated
by Watters’ struggle to recover his decency and win, a kind of Blind Side story
with little sentimentality and few illusions.
-
A Las Vegas setting—the world
of The Hangover movies and many youth films like Bridesmaids—will appeal to
20s-30s readers.
-
Watters’ romance with a former
prostitute will appeal to younger female readers. The marital tension between Detective Dayton
and his wife will interest adults. Both men and women will enjoy the twist on
the femme fatale figure of the murderer’s lover, who has her own schemes.
-
Lovers of history, as the term,
“Dead Man’s Hand”, is a legend dating back to the Wild West of the 1800’s.
I started creating relationships on the
internet through Facebook and Twitter. I met not only authors, but fans of the
genres I write.
When my book was released in October, 2012,
I felt I had a solid foundation to stand on, but I still had a long way to go.
I contacted media for interviews, held book
signings, joined shows and blog toured. I contacted anyone who wrote a blog and
asked about being a guest. I joined Pinterest, Linkedin, and Google +, as well
as sites created to support Indie authors. I did anything I could to get my
name out there, get my book in front of readers.
My publisher set up special promotions
where my book was FREE on Amazon for certain periods of time. All of this was
done to increase my following, and expand the awareness of my book on a
worldwide scale. This will hopefully lead to future sales with not only my
debut novel, but subsequent books.
I’ve been happy with the result thus far,
but I don’t have anything to compare it to. I feel that the more books I write,
the more success I will have. The more I get out there, the more excitement and
interest is garnered.
It’s a marathon, not a sprint. J
Dead Man's Hand
What happens when the deck is stacked against you…
From NFL rising-star prospect to wanted
fugitive, Calvin Watters is a sadistic African-American Las
Vegas debt-collector framed by a murderer who, like the Vegas Police,
finds him to be the perfect fall-guy.
…and the cards don't fall your way?
When the brutal slaying of a prominent
casino owner is followed by the murder of a well-known bookie, Detective Dale
Dayton is thrown into the middle of a highly political case and leads the
largest homicide investigation in Vegas in the last twelve years.
What if you're dealt a Dead Man's Hand?
Against his superiors and better judgment, Dayton is willing to give Calvin one last chance. To
redeem himself, Calvin must prove his innocence by finding the real killer,
while avoiding the LVMPD, as well as protect the woman he loves from a
professional assassin hired to silence them.
"You may want to give it the whole night, just to see how it turns out."
—William Martin, New York Times bestselling author of The Lincoln Letter
—William Martin, New York Times bestselling author of The Lincoln Letter
"Dead Man's Hand is a pleasure, a debut novel that doesn't read like one,
but still presents original characters and a fresh new voice."
—Thomas Perry, New York Times bestselling author of Poison Flower
but still presents original characters and a fresh new voice."
—Thomas Perry, New York Times bestselling author of Poison Flower
"Part police procedural, part crime fiction, Dead Man's Hand is a fast, gritty ride."
—Anne Frasier, USA Today bestselling author of Hush
—Anne Frasier, USA Today bestselling author of Hush
And you can find Dead Man's Hand at Amazon.com.
Monday, November 18, 2013
Guest Author Interview: Luke Murphy
Luke Murphy |
Please welcome Luke Murphy:
Have you always wanted to be a writer?
Actually my writing happened by accident. Growing up I never thought much about writing, but I was an avid reader. The only time I ever wrote was when my teachers at school made me. I wanted to be an NHL superstar…period.
It was the winter of 2000, my second year of professional hockey, and I was playing in Oklahoma City. After sustaining a season ending eye injury (one of the scariest moments of my life), I found myself with time on his hands.
My girlfriend at the time, who is now my wife, was attending a French college in Montreal. She received an English assignment to write a short story, and asked me for some help.
I loved the experience—creating vivid characters and generating a wire-taut plot. So, I sat down at my roommate’s computer and began typing. I wrote a little every day, around my intense rehabilitation schedule and before I knew it I had completed my first manuscript.
I didn’t write with the intention of being published. I wrote for the love of writing.
Twelve years later, I still write for pleasure—and I still love it! The fact that I am being published is a bonus.
Can you tell us a little bit more about your novel?
DEAD MAN’S HAND is a crime-thriller set in Las Vegas. It takes readers inside the head of Calvin Watters, a sadistically violent African-American Las Vegas debt-collector, who was once a rising football star, now a murder suspect on the run.
What happens when the deck is stacked against you…
From NFL rising-star prospect to wanted fugitive, Calvin Watters is a sadistic African-American Las Vegas debt-collector framed by a murderer who, like the Vegas Police, finds him to be the perfect fall-guy.
…and the cards don't fall your way?
When the brutal slaying of a prominent casino owner is followed by the murder of a well-known
bookie, Detective Dale Dayton is thrown into the middle of a highly political case and leads the largest homicide investigation in Vegas in the last twelve years.
What if you're dealt a Dead Man's Hand?
Against his superiors and better judgment, Dayton is willing to give Calvin one last chance. To redeem himself, Calvin must prove his innocence by finding the real killer, while avoiding the LVMPD, as well as protect the woman he loves from a professional assassin hired to silence them.
What brought you to this genre?
My first chapter books were the Hardy Boys titles, so they are the reason I love mysteries. As an adult, some of my favorite authors are Harlan Coben, Michael Connelly and Greg Iles, so naturally I write what I love to read – mystery/suspense novels. DEAD MAN`S HAND has been compared to James Patterson books, which to me is an honour. Maybe in style (short chapters, a quick read), as I have read many of his books.
What inspired you to write this particular book?
I never thought much about writing when I was growing up.
But I was always an avid reader, which I owe to my mother. She was a librarian, and although I lost her when I was young, I will always remember a stack on Danielle Steele books on her bedside table, and a lot of books lying around the house at my disposal.
Plot: I get my ideas from stories I hear about, whether through reading (newspapers, magazines, etc.), what I hear (radio) or what I see (TV, movies, internet, etc.). The plot is completely fictional. I wouldn`t say that one thing or person influences my writing, but a variety of my life experiences all have led to my passion in the written word. There is not a single moment in time when this idea came to be, but circumstances over the years that led to this story: my hockey injuries, frequent visits to Las Vegas, my love of football, crime books and movies. Dead Man’s Hand became real from mixing these events, taking advantage of experts in their field, and adding my wild imagination. The internet also provides a wealth of information, available at our fingertips with a click of the mouse.
Setting: I usually set my stories in cities I`ve visited and fell in love with. Las Vegas was the perfect backdrop for this story, glitz and glamour as well as an untapped underground.
Characters: I have never been involved in a homicide investigation, LOL. Although I am not a 6’5”, 220 pound African-American, I’ve used much of my athletic background when creating my protagonist Calvin Watters. Watters past as an athlete, and his emotional rollercoaster brought on by injuries were drawn from my experiences. His mother died of cancer when he was young, as mine was. There are certainly elements of myself in Calvin, but overall, this is a work of fiction. I did not base the characters or plot on any real people or events. Any familiarities are strictly coincidence.
I’ve always been a self-motivated person, and my harshest critic. Whether it was in school, hockey or writing, I’ve been the one to put the most pressure on myself to succeed, to be the best in everything I try.
How do you react if/when you get any negative reviews?
I have received a couple of 2-star reviews, but to be honest, they were actually pretty nice 2-star reviews. More comments like, “it wasn’t for me” or “thought it was a Western”. So I can’t complain so far.
But I don’t take the comments or reviews personally. I know that my book won’t suit everyone, because there are diverse tastes around the world.
Who is your favorite character and why?
Definitely the protagonist in my novel, Calvin Watters.
Many people have asked if I can make any real connections to the main character in my novel. The answer, as for my connection…no, I have never been involved in a homicide investigation, LOL. The plot is completely fictional. Although I am not a 6’5”, 220 pound African-American, I’ve used much of my athletic background when creating my protagonist Calvin Watters. Watters past as an athlete, and his emotional rollercoaster brought on by injuries were drawn from my experiences. His mother died of cancer when he was young, as mine was. There are certainly elements of myself in Calvin, but overall, this is a work of fiction. I did not base the characters or plot on any real people or events. Any familiarities are strictly coincidence.
As far as characterization goes, Dead Man’s Hand’s protagonist Calvin Watters faces racial prejudice with calmness similar to that of Walter Mosley’s character Easy Rawlins. But Watters’ past as an athlete and enforcer will remind other readers of (Jack) Reacher of the Lee Childs series. The Stuart Woods novel Choke, about a tennis player who, like Watters, suffered greatly from a dramatic loss that was a failure of his psyche, is also an inspiration for Dead Man’s Hand.
When thinking about creating the main character for my story, I wanted someone “REAL”. Someone readers could relate to. Although it is a work of fiction, my goal was to create a character who readers could make a real connection with.
Physically, keeping in mind Watters’ past as an NCAA football standout and his current occupation as a Vegas debt-collector, I thought “intimidating”, and put together a mix of characteristics that make Watters appear scary (dreadlocks and patchy facial hair), but also able to blend in with those of the social elite. Although he is in astounding physical condition, handsome and well-toned, he does have a physical disability that limits his capabilities.
He’s proud, confident bordering on cocky, mean and tough, but I also gave him a softer side that readers, especially women, will be more comfortable rooting for. After his humiliating downfall he is stuck at the bottom for a while, but trying hard to work his way back up.
He has weaknesses and he has made poor choices. He has regrets, but Watters has the opportunity to redeem himself. Not everyone gets a second chance in life, and he realizes how fortunate he is.
Calvin Watters is definitely worth rooting for.
Are you working on anything else at the moment?
I’m currently working on my second novel, another crime-thriller, following the career of rookie, female LAPD detective Charlene Taylor.
I would love to write another book. Right now, I have a full time job (teaching), a part-time tutoring job, and three small children (all girls, YIKES!!).
I don`t have much time to write, but when I get a chance, I do all I can. It could take some time, but eventually I would love to write a series of novels featuring Calvin Watters. But I will not limit my novels to Calvin Watters, as I would like to write a variety of novels, all in the crime-thriller genres.
Do you have any advice to other authors who would like to be published?
Get a part-time job to pay the bills (haha). Just kidding. Honestly, for anyone who wants to be a writer, you need to have three things: patience, determination and thick skin. You can`t let anyone or anything get in the way of your ultimate goal. You will hear a lot of “no's”, but it only takes one “yes”. The writing industry is a slow-moving machine, and you need to wait it out. Never quit or give up on your dreams.
Just for fun.
If you could be any paranormal or have any one supernatural talent, what would it be? Why?
Speak to the dead. I would love to talk with my mother, who died when I was young.
What’s your guilty pleasure?
Definitely potato chips.
Chocolate or Ice Cream?
I like both, but I’m more of a salt over sweet kind of guy.
What’s your favorite music?
I don’t listen to a lot of music. When I’m in the car I listen to sports talk radio. But if I had to choose, I’d say 80’s rock. Unfortunately, living with a wife and 3 daughters, I listen to a lot of One Direction, Miley Cyrus, Katy Perry, etc.
Who would you pick to date? The bad girl or the sweetheart? Why?
I would pick the bad girl to date, and the proper lady to marry. For obvious reasons LOL
If you had a super power what would it be? Why?
I would love to fly. I think that would be pretty cool - an easy escape when necessary.
Do you believe in ghosts? Why?
Never have, never will. I’m one of those guys who needs actual proof or facts before I can believe in something. [I'm with you there-SET]
Dead Man's Hand
What happens when the deck is stacked against you…
From NFL rising-star prospect to wanted
fugitive, Calvin Watters is a sadistic African-American Las
Vegas debt-collector framed by a murderer who, like the Vegas Police,
finds him to be the perfect fall-guy.
…and the cards don't fall your way?
When the brutal slaying of a prominent
casino owner is followed by the murder of a well-known bookie, Detective Dale
Dayton is thrown into the middle of a highly political case and leads the
largest homicide investigation in Vegas in the last twelve years.
What if you're dealt a Dead Man's Hand?
Against his superiors and better judgment, Dayton is willing to give Calvin one last chance. To
redeem himself, Calvin must prove his innocence by finding the real killer,
while avoiding the LVMPD, as well as protect the woman he loves from a
professional assassin hired to silence them.
"You may want to give it the whole night, just to see how it turns out."
—William Martin, New York Times bestselling author of The Lincoln Letter
—William Martin, New York Times bestselling author of The Lincoln Letter
"Dead Man's Hand is a pleasure, a debut novel that doesn't read like one,
but still presents original characters and a fresh new voice."
—Thomas Perry, New York Times bestselling author of Poison Flower
but still presents original characters and a fresh new voice."
—Thomas Perry, New York Times bestselling author of Poison Flower
"Part police procedural, part crime fiction, Dead Man's Hand is a fast, gritty ride."
—Anne Frasier, USA Today bestselling author of Hush
—Anne Frasier, USA Today bestselling author of Hush
And you can find Dead Man's Hand at Amazon.com.
Saturday, November 16, 2013
Standardization is a Good Thing
When I buy a computer, unless it is an Apple, it comes with a Windows operating system. For better or for worse (I haven't tired Windows 8, yet), this is the standard. I can buy a Dell and get Windows. I can buy an HP and get Windows. I can even by an Apple and have Windows on it. This standardization is a good thing because it 1) fosters competition by computer makers to make better computers because consumers can be comfortable switching brands without worrying they have to learn a whole new operating system (which is one reason I have not switched to Apple) and 2) if someone hands me a PC, no matter the brand, I can probably operate it since I'll be familiar with its OS (unless it's Windows 8).
So why, when you buy a Ford, you get "Ford MyTouch" and when you buy a Chevrolet you get "Chevrolet MyLink" and when you buy a Cadillac (built by the same manufacturer as Chevrolet) you get "CUE" (a whole other system) and I could go on and on because it seems every car manufacturer has a proprietary OS for their infotainment and navigation systems. (Interestingly, I looked at a Chrysler 300 recently and it seemed to have a Garmin navigation system, which to me is a step in the right direction.)
An aside: My opinion is, don't buy navigation systems for cars. They want $1,000 for them and then charge you to update them. Buy a Garmin for $200 and you can carry it from car to car (including rental cars) and they update much cheaper (if not free).
The reasons for this have to do with both the history of the PC and the history of the car. But I think automakers should standardize. Yes, they want their luxury cars to have better infotainment than their base models (thus "MyLink" and "CUE") but they could have similar OSs but with more options. Like Windows Home and Windows Professional and Windows Professional Premium. That way when you buy a new car, you don't have to sit in the driveway with the owners manual (which they are stopping printing and putting on DVD/CD so I'm not sure how you're supposed to read them in the car) and figure out how to turn on the radio or enter a destination in the nav system.
And I've yet to have a car that understands voice commands as well as Siri does on my iPhone (and she has trouble, too). I've pretty much given up using the nav systems in my cars because Siri works so much better (and stays up to date and doesn't want to charge me $150 for updated navigation CDs). The only bad part is the small screen on my phone (helps a lot when a passenger can use their iPhone and give you directions). Now if I could integrate my iPhone with my car's infotainment system . . .
So I think standardization of car infotainment systems would be a good thing. But try to get BMW and Mercedes to agree on anything!
So why, when you buy a Ford, you get "Ford MyTouch" and when you buy a Chevrolet you get "Chevrolet MyLink" and when you buy a Cadillac (built by the same manufacturer as Chevrolet) you get "CUE" (a whole other system) and I could go on and on because it seems every car manufacturer has a proprietary OS for their infotainment and navigation systems. (Interestingly, I looked at a Chrysler 300 recently and it seemed to have a Garmin navigation system, which to me is a step in the right direction.)
An aside: My opinion is, don't buy navigation systems for cars. They want $1,000 for them and then charge you to update them. Buy a Garmin for $200 and you can carry it from car to car (including rental cars) and they update much cheaper (if not free).
The reasons for this have to do with both the history of the PC and the history of the car. But I think automakers should standardize. Yes, they want their luxury cars to have better infotainment than their base models (thus "MyLink" and "CUE") but they could have similar OSs but with more options. Like Windows Home and Windows Professional and Windows Professional Premium. That way when you buy a new car, you don't have to sit in the driveway with the owners manual (which they are stopping printing and putting on DVD/CD so I'm not sure how you're supposed to read them in the car) and figure out how to turn on the radio or enter a destination in the nav system.
And I've yet to have a car that understands voice commands as well as Siri does on my iPhone (and she has trouble, too). I've pretty much given up using the nav systems in my cars because Siri works so much better (and stays up to date and doesn't want to charge me $150 for updated navigation CDs). The only bad part is the small screen on my phone (helps a lot when a passenger can use their iPhone and give you directions). Now if I could integrate my iPhone with my car's infotainment system . . .
So I think standardization of car infotainment systems would be a good thing. But try to get BMW and Mercedes to agree on anything!
Friday, November 15, 2013
Isolated
I live in kind of a weird spot. I live in the middle of Washington State (sort of) in a county bigger than the state of Delaware. The population of the town I live just outside of is about 20,000 people but there are nearly 50,000 who share the same zip code and almost 100,000 people in the county. Yes, I know if you live in New York City there's probably 100,000 people within a few blocks of you.
This town is geographically isolated. It's on Interstate 90 and if you go east on the interstate, the next biggest town you hit is 100 miles (160 km) away. In fact, there is really two other towns between here and that larger town, and they are both tiny. If you go west on I-90, you don't hit a bigger town until you get to the suburbs of Seattle, about 160 miles (257 km) away. Yes, there is a larger town northeast of here about 70 miles (112 km) driving distance away and the "Tri-cities" are south about 70 miles (driving) and they are all bigger.
So, my point being, this is the largest town for quite a long ways around. But we're isolated. To get on a commercial airplane we have to drive minimum 70 miles. To shop somewhere other than WalMart you used to have to drive, again, minimum 70 miles (actually, I usually did the 100 because it was all freeway and took about as long as going the 70 miles to the Tri-Cities). The nearest 4-year university is, you guessed it, 70 miles away. This town didn't have touch tone phones until the late 1970s. And while the retail situation is improving, it's still pretty slim selection.
What inspired this post was I was looking at the National Weather Service website and our weather reports come from 100 miles away. Why aren't they generated locally?
I have Facebook friends who live in smaller towns (in Idaho, of all places) and they have more shopping and restaurant choices than we do. I think, for some reason, this town is so isolated that people simply don't know it's here. We are another Starbucks stop on the interstate, and that's it. And it's been that way for as long as I can remember (well, after we got a Starbucks, before that we weren't even a place to stop).
This town is geographically isolated. It's on Interstate 90 and if you go east on the interstate, the next biggest town you hit is 100 miles (160 km) away. In fact, there is really two other towns between here and that larger town, and they are both tiny. If you go west on I-90, you don't hit a bigger town until you get to the suburbs of Seattle, about 160 miles (257 km) away. Yes, there is a larger town northeast of here about 70 miles (112 km) driving distance away and the "Tri-cities" are south about 70 miles (driving) and they are all bigger.
So, my point being, this is the largest town for quite a long ways around. But we're isolated. To get on a commercial airplane we have to drive minimum 70 miles. To shop somewhere other than WalMart you used to have to drive, again, minimum 70 miles (actually, I usually did the 100 because it was all freeway and took about as long as going the 70 miles to the Tri-Cities). The nearest 4-year university is, you guessed it, 70 miles away. This town didn't have touch tone phones until the late 1970s. And while the retail situation is improving, it's still pretty slim selection.
What inspired this post was I was looking at the National Weather Service website and our weather reports come from 100 miles away. Why aren't they generated locally?
I have Facebook friends who live in smaller towns (in Idaho, of all places) and they have more shopping and restaurant choices than we do. I think, for some reason, this town is so isolated that people simply don't know it's here. We are another Starbucks stop on the interstate, and that's it. And it's been that way for as long as I can remember (well, after we got a Starbucks, before that we weren't even a place to stop).
Movie Review: Pacific Rim
When I first saw the ads on TV for Pacific Rim, I thought, "Oh, dear, here's a live action mecha movie that will be huge on special effects on short on story." Then the Rotten Tomatoes score came in pretty high and my kids went and saw it and thought it was good, so I put it in my Netflix queue.
The purpose of special effects in a movie is to show the audience something it can't see in real life or, in some cases, to show something it would be to dangerous, difficult, or expensive to do in real life. And with computer generated imagery (CGI) that is only limited to the film makers' imagination and budget. The best special effects are those where the audience doesn't even realize there is a special effect on the screen. But with a movie such as Pacific Rim, that's impossible. There are no giant monsters rising up from the sea and there are no huge robots with people inside them to fight the monsters. But still, the film makers can hope to achieve the point where the audience isn't thinking "Wow, what a cool special effect" but is thinking, "I hope the robot wins this fight." Some film makers make the mistake of thinking the special effects are the story but good film makers know that a good story and compelling complex characters have to be there, the special effects only enhance it. My touchstone for such movies is the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Huge amount of CGI effects throughout, yet it never, ever lets go of the story. And yes, there are times you forget that Golum is a CGI effect.
Pacific Rim, while no LOTR, never lets go of the story. Yes, there are times you think, "Wow, the CGI effects budget on this film must be huge" but it's hard to get away from that with huge robots fighting huge monsters. It's not like 6,000 riders of Rohan that you can forget are a CGI effect. But the personalities, the stories, and the pain and triumph of the characters always comes through despite the huge effects budget. No, it's not Pride and Prejudice with robots and there's a few hoary clichés, but over all, Pacific Rim is enjoyable and fun.
The purpose of special effects in a movie is to show the audience something it can't see in real life or, in some cases, to show something it would be to dangerous, difficult, or expensive to do in real life. And with computer generated imagery (CGI) that is only limited to the film makers' imagination and budget. The best special effects are those where the audience doesn't even realize there is a special effect on the screen. But with a movie such as Pacific Rim, that's impossible. There are no giant monsters rising up from the sea and there are no huge robots with people inside them to fight the monsters. But still, the film makers can hope to achieve the point where the audience isn't thinking "Wow, what a cool special effect" but is thinking, "I hope the robot wins this fight." Some film makers make the mistake of thinking the special effects are the story but good film makers know that a good story and compelling complex characters have to be there, the special effects only enhance it. My touchstone for such movies is the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Huge amount of CGI effects throughout, yet it never, ever lets go of the story. And yes, there are times you forget that Golum is a CGI effect.
Pacific Rim, while no LOTR, never lets go of the story. Yes, there are times you think, "Wow, the CGI effects budget on this film must be huge" but it's hard to get away from that with huge robots fighting huge monsters. It's not like 6,000 riders of Rohan that you can forget are a CGI effect. But the personalities, the stories, and the pain and triumph of the characters always comes through despite the huge effects budget. No, it's not Pride and Prejudice with robots and there's a few hoary clichés, but over all, Pacific Rim is enjoyable and fun.
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Movie Review: Australia
Yes, I normally review movies quite a while after they come out because I watch most movies on Blu-ray or DVD from Netflix which means I have to wait until the DVD/Blu-ray to come out then often four weeks after that because Netflix doesn't release some new releases for four weeks after you can buy them because of a deal they made with movie studios to get streaming content. Yes, it's very annoying.
But here I am about to review a movie from 2008: Australia. For those of you math-challenged, that's five years old.
When this movie first came out I had no interest in it because it just looked like a western cum travelogue mishmash of a film. But my mother was waxing rhapsodic about it a while back and wishing she could see it in high definition (she doesn't own an HDTV) so I said I'd put it on my Netflix list and when it bubbled to the top invite her over to watch it.
I put it at the bottom of my queue figuring it would be safely down there for months.
But, Netflix is being kind of weird lately (ever since, it seems, I sent back a non-working disc of Oblivion and demanded they send me a new one). I have two movies released in 1999 and 2000, respectively, both on "long wait." I had four released movies in my queue ahead of Australia and they sent me . . . Australia. So I invited my mother over to watch it and we watched the 2 hour, 45 minute movie.
I think what happened is a bunch of Australian actors and producers and maybe even the director thought "hey, let's make a movie about the grand history of our country." But what they forgot was: compelling characters and a plot that wasn't lifted from old John Wayne movies. What we ended up with was a predictable plot, gross clichés (oh, aren't the native folk so much smarter and honorable than the white people), and cheesy special effects. There was even about two minutes of film clipped right out of the 38-year-old movie Tora! Tora! Tora! before the Japanese attack on Darwin.
Yes, the scenery was often spectacular (looked a lot like southern Utah to me) and yes, the actors did what they could with the material they were given (oh, Nicole Kidman, you tried so hard, you did.)
(Speaking of Nicole Kidman, remember when she looked like this:
What happened? Did she have a botched facelift?)
What you had with Australia was a movie trying so hard to be epic, it was mediocre. Yes, Australia is an amazing country with a rich history and fascinating aboriginal culture. But this movie seemed to just gloss over all that in favor of spectacle and barely-believable romance salted with Hollywood clichés. Not how I want to spend 2 hours and 45 minutes.
But here I am about to review a movie from 2008: Australia. For those of you math-challenged, that's five years old.
When this movie first came out I had no interest in it because it just looked like a western cum travelogue mishmash of a film. But my mother was waxing rhapsodic about it a while back and wishing she could see it in high definition (she doesn't own an HDTV) so I said I'd put it on my Netflix list and when it bubbled to the top invite her over to watch it.
I put it at the bottom of my queue figuring it would be safely down there for months.
But, Netflix is being kind of weird lately (ever since, it seems, I sent back a non-working disc of Oblivion and demanded they send me a new one). I have two movies released in 1999 and 2000, respectively, both on "long wait." I had four released movies in my queue ahead of Australia and they sent me . . . Australia. So I invited my mother over to watch it and we watched the 2 hour, 45 minute movie.
I think what happened is a bunch of Australian actors and producers and maybe even the director thought "hey, let's make a movie about the grand history of our country." But what they forgot was: compelling characters and a plot that wasn't lifted from old John Wayne movies. What we ended up with was a predictable plot, gross clichés (oh, aren't the native folk so much smarter and honorable than the white people), and cheesy special effects. There was even about two minutes of film clipped right out of the 38-year-old movie Tora! Tora! Tora! before the Japanese attack on Darwin.
Yes, the scenery was often spectacular (looked a lot like southern Utah to me) and yes, the actors did what they could with the material they were given (oh, Nicole Kidman, you tried so hard, you did.)
(Speaking of Nicole Kidman, remember when she looked like this:
What happened? Did she have a botched facelift?)
What you had with Australia was a movie trying so hard to be epic, it was mediocre. Yes, Australia is an amazing country with a rich history and fascinating aboriginal culture. But this movie seemed to just gloss over all that in favor of spectacle and barely-believable romance salted with Hollywood clichés. Not how I want to spend 2 hours and 45 minutes.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
WIP Blurb
My current (novel) WIP (Work in Progress) is called The Treasure of the Black Hole. This weekend it goes on second edit and after that it goes to proofreaders. Then I'll have my wife read it out loud to me (yes, the whole thing) which I found with Gods of Strife (still at my publisher) really helped find things my eyes would have missed. Luckily, Treasure is about 68% as long as Gods.
I'm so excited about Treasure, I've even written the back cover blurb for it already. Here it is:
I'm so excited about Treasure, I've even written the back cover blurb for it already. Here it is:
The Stuff that Dreams
are Made Of . . .
When private detective Rick Bailey is hired by the
exotically beautiful and outrageously wealthy Princess Nora, he thinks it'll be
easy money. Escaping from her
rebellion-torn kingdom, the princess has lost her handmaiden, Lores: the only
person who knows how to find the hidden royal jewels.
But when his search for the equally lovely Lores turns
deadly, Bailey realizes that there is more to this case than it first
seemed. When someone tries to kill him,
he discovers that the roots of evil run deep.
With his own set of values and sense of honor, Bailey must
keep one step ahead of murderous mobsters, secret government operatives, and a
genetically enhanced Lores as he races across the galaxy in search of the
truth. The only things he knows he can
trust are his eight-foot-tall ladybug-like secretary and a powerful weapon
that responds to his thoughts.
Will Bailey find the treasure of the black hole in time and
will he survive long enough to discover why it is something worth killing for?
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Cheating at NaNoWriMo
Shhhh, don't tell anyone but I'm cheating at NaNoWriMo (National Novel Writing Month).
Here's the problem: when November rolled around I was 40,462 words into a WIP (Work in Progress). My goal for the WIP was about 60,000 words. That meant for NaNoWriMo I could only write about 20,000 word and you're supposed to write 50,000.
So, I made a nefarious plan. Instead of just counting the words in my WIP, I'd count everything I wrote, including blog posts, freelance assignments, and short stories (yes, this blog post will be counted). I know this isn't what you're supposed to do for NaNoWriMo. But if I only wrote 20,000 words left on my WIP, I would disappoint the local NaNoWriMo group who is counting on my word count to add to their total word count (which is right now at an amazing 527,799 words).
Oh, and I finished the first draft of the novel on November 3rd, not quite at 60,000 words (after the first edits, it was 59,985 words).
Now, it might have been a bit of a stretch to include the glossary I wrote for proofreaders and editors for my WIP and blurb I wrote (and rewrote and rewrote over and over) in my total word count. But they were things I wrote. Not counting this blog post, I am at 32,934 words with 1,800 of them written today (in a short story I'm writing).
So, yes, I'm cheating. Maybe next year I'll be able to start a novel on November 1st and do NaNoWriMo the right way. My local writers' group is big on it and I want to support the group. But I also write on my own schedule. If I have an idea for a novel I'm going to start writing it no matter when it is.
I just hope they don't mind I'm cheating a bit this year.
Here's the problem: when November rolled around I was 40,462 words into a WIP (Work in Progress). My goal for the WIP was about 60,000 words. That meant for NaNoWriMo I could only write about 20,000 word and you're supposed to write 50,000.
So, I made a nefarious plan. Instead of just counting the words in my WIP, I'd count everything I wrote, including blog posts, freelance assignments, and short stories (yes, this blog post will be counted). I know this isn't what you're supposed to do for NaNoWriMo. But if I only wrote 20,000 words left on my WIP, I would disappoint the local NaNoWriMo group who is counting on my word count to add to their total word count (which is right now at an amazing 527,799 words).
Oh, and I finished the first draft of the novel on November 3rd, not quite at 60,000 words (after the first edits, it was 59,985 words).
Now, it might have been a bit of a stretch to include the glossary I wrote for proofreaders and editors for my WIP and blurb I wrote (and rewrote and rewrote over and over) in my total word count. But they were things I wrote. Not counting this blog post, I am at 32,934 words with 1,800 of them written today (in a short story I'm writing).
So, yes, I'm cheating. Maybe next year I'll be able to start a novel on November 1st and do NaNoWriMo the right way. My local writers' group is big on it and I want to support the group. But I also write on my own schedule. If I have an idea for a novel I'm going to start writing it no matter when it is.
I just hope they don't mind I'm cheating a bit this year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)