Jeopardy Desk Calendar

 My son gave me a 2025 Jeopardy desk calendar for Christmas last year. And I've enjoyed it all year long. I'm sure he got it for me because I watch Jeopardy every weekday. Well, unless it's preempted for sports. Which makes me grumpy, especially because it's usually basketball.

The calendar is set up for you to record your winnings and then bet and do Final Jeopardy on Sundays. I haven't been doing that. I just keep track of how many clues I've gotten correct in a row. My personal best is 13 (see picture). Before that it was eight. I was feeling pretty good about 13 until I got two answers in a row incorrect including last Monday's. The Monday clues are usually the easiest of the week. 

I watch Jeopardy because I enjoy challenging my brain. And I have a cordial competition with a friend on who can get the most Final Jeopardy answers correct in a week. She usually wins (last week we tied). 

Do you watch Jeopardy? Why or why not. Let me know in the comments below.

The PItch Clock

The World Series starts tomorrow (without the Mariners!). And that reminds me that I, yes, I, invented the pitch timer.

In 2017 I was watching an MLB game (probably the Seattle Mariners). I don't watch a lot of baseball games and have, in fact, made it my goal to watch zero MLB games per season.

During that game, I watched as the pitcher would goof off before throwing the ball and the batter would step out of the batter box to adjust his gloves or hit his shoes with his bat for some reason.

And I decided that baseball needed a pitch clock. I posted this on facebook:

And in 2023, MLB introduced a pitch "timer" which is basically a pitch clock. So I was six years ahead of the MLB. Now the MLB rules are a bit different from what I proposed, including the amount of time given being a lot more. I based my 7 seconds on how long it took the pitcher to throw the ball after he gets it if he doesn't goof off.

What do you think of the pitch clock? Hate it or love it? It's supposed to speed up games (I'm not sure if it has). 

1978 Best Picture

The recent death of Diane Keaton made me sad. She was a wonderful actor especially in the Godfather movies.

It also reminded me of the 1978 Academy Awards. Those were the 50th annual Academy Awards. But that's not what I remembered.

Diane Keaton won the best actress in a leading role Oscar for the movie Annie Hall, a movie directed by Woody Allen and for which he won Best Director (probably didn't show up).

But it was the best picture Oscar that really upset me. The nominees were:

• Annie Hall (it was funny in that understated, Woody Allen way)
• Julia (I don't remember anything about it)
• The Turning Point (ditto)
• The Goodbye Girl (a funny comedy)
• Star Wars 

And the winner was.... Annie Hall.

Now, let me ask you: which movie of those five had the biggest impact on the movie industry. It wasn't Annie Hall, a barely remembered comedy. It was, of course, Star Wars. It launched a whole science fiction franchise that is still going on. If it weren't for Star Wars, there would have been no Star Trek: The Motion Picture which revived that science fiction franchise that is still going on. Without Star Wars there would be no Star Trek series such as The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine.

But the Academy hates popular movies and Star Wars was the biggest grossing movie of 1977. But I was so mad I refused to watch Annie Hall for decades. I kind of regretted that when I finally watched it because it is an enjoyable film.

Do you think Star Wars should have won the 1978 Best Picture Oscar? Let me know in the comments below.

The above photo is being used under Section 107 of the Copyright Act: fair usage.

The "Graveyard"

A recent weekend I watched two science fiction movies back-to-back that couldn't be more different and yet, coincidentally, where linked. 

The first was Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. It was the last Star Trek movie with all of the TOS crew (some were in Star Trek: Generations). That Star Trek VI was a cold war ending allegory could hardly be more obvious. I've discussed a bit of this movie before. Not sure why I watched it. I guess I felt as if I hadn't seen it for a while.

The second movie I watched was the 1954 Disney version of 20,000 Leagues under the Sea. To be honest, I'm not sure what inspired me to watch it. It was based on the 1868 book by Jules Verne Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas. The movie starred James Mason as Captain Nemo, Kirk Douglas as an American whaler, and Peter Lorre as the French professor's apprentice. Those were the only actors I recognized. 

I know I'd seen 20,000 Leagues under the Sea before as a kid, maybe in the theater. In the 1960s and early '70s, Disney would re-release its live-action and animated movies because, for some reason, they weren't making new ones. In any case, I know I've seen that movie before. Also, I'm not sure but I might have read the book (translated to English, of course). I know I read Journey to the Center of the Earth by Verne when I was a kid. Later in life I read Around the World in Eighty Days.

20,000 Leagues under the Sea is about a submarine (very much science fiction in 1868) named Nautilus that attacks ships by ramming them. It is powered by a mysterious, abundant source of energy. This is why the first nuclear submarine in the U.S. Navy was named Nautilus after the submarine in the book/movie. 

But how are they linked?

Warning: SPOILERS ahead.

In Star Trek VI, Kirk and McCoy are accused of killing the Klingon chancellor. At their trial they are sentenced to the prison asteroid of Rura Penthe, known throughout the galaxy as "the Aliens' Graveyard."

In 20,000 Leagues under the Sea, Captain Nemo takes the professor to see Rura Penthe, "the white mans' graveyard."

I bought the Kindle version of the Vern book for 29 cents (31 cents with tax). I searched for "Rura Penthe" and "graveyard" and neither came up. So I'm thinking it's only in the movie.

The writers of Star Trek VI snuck in a Jules Verne and/or Disney reference in the movie. The screenplay was written by Nicholas Meyer and Denny Martin Flinn. I would think it was Meyer (who also directed) who snuck in that reference. He likes to do that in his movies. 

But if I hadn't watched the movies back-to-back, I would probably have never made that connection.

Survivor Bias

Entertainment gives us all survivor bias. 

Let me explain.

The hero/heroine always survives (except in Titanic but that's a rare exception). Books, movies, television, the protagonist always survives. Think about the movie Independence Day (try not to think too much, it's not a very good movie). Millions die but most of the main characters live.

I'm guilty of this. In my books the protagonist (almost) always survives. I did kill off my main character once in a book.

Because of entertainment, I believe we all secretly think we're going to survive. I think people going into a war have to think they will survive. Otherwise, they wouldn't go. But some don't survive.

But in real life, your odds of surviving disasters are much less. I remember reading years ago (I think in Readers Digest) about a skyscraper fire in Brazil (this might have been the fire). People trying to escape came to the end of a hall. There were two ways out: left or right. The ones that went one way survived. The ones that went the other way, didn't. So you had a 50% chance of making the wrong choice and dying. And that stuck with me. A 50% chance of dying based on a random choice. That's scary.

When I drove on the racetrack, I assumed nothing bad was going to happen to me even though what I was doing was inherently dangerous. (Nothing bad did happen.)

So, we all probably have survivor bias. I think we wouldn't step out of the safety of our houses if we didn't to some degree. 

Do you think people have survivor bias and it's mostly because of popular entertainment? Let me know in the comments below.